Capitalism is the Monetary Policy of Christianity

In Christian mythology, people are told to treat their fellow person as they would like to be treated and if they do this they will go to heaven. If they don't, they will go to hell. So compare how this fits with capitalism.

Capitalism says that in order to eat, you must bring something to the table. How well you eat is dependent on how well you sell something, good or bad. However, on balance, the most successful sell the best widget. Unfortunately, many bad widget sellers succeed do to the ever present gullibility of some humans. However, in the ideal, capitalism is a system that favors those who present the best widget. At its worst, it favors a talented salesperson.

So how does this tie with the Christian principal of doing good leads to heaven and vice versa? If you provide a better widget, all of your customers lives are enhanced. Their giving you their money enables you to purchase a million dollar estate in Burbank, which is, for all intents and purposes 'heaven'.  If you fail to enrich your fellow person's life by building a better widget, then they will not give you money and you will have to live in a studio apartment in the ghetto, which is the present equivalent of 'hell'.

As for the great salesman element, there seems to be a correlation between dishonest salesmen and unhappy endings. Regardless, capitalism can't be blamed for the foolish purchase of the uninformed.

In a nutshell, capitalism is a system or dynamic that rewards success as defined as making a positive contribution to the well being of our fellow people and defines failure as a failure to make a positive impact on your neighbors life. You would think for all the morally superior people out there who care so much for the downtrodden, they would embrace capitalism as the only possible system.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

$27 trillion questions

 In that our country's financial underpinnings are a runaway train, it needs to be asked, "What exactly is meant by the term 'national debt' and why must interest, determined by the private Federal Reserve (FR), be paid on it?" And the most important question is "where do those interest payments go?" The FR was created in 1913 whereby the ordinary functions of the Treasury were given to private bankers. They invented the concept that they would be, not only the controllers, but the source of our nation's finances. The way it works is, if the government spends more than it takes in, the FR would 'loan' the govt money by printing it into existence and thereafter, the govt would be required to pay 'interest' on the 'loan' ad infinitum and that interest rate would be set by the FR. The explanation for this arrangement was that the FR was needed to regulate the availability of money to spur or retard the rate of growth to control i...
Read more

Nearly as Simple as the Sun

An ideal reactor can be all but authenticated using computer simulation, probably within a day. Our engineering and computing capabilities are clearly sufficient. And all it would take to prove it is the decision to challenge the assertion. So why does this assertion matter to you? Because Germany pays upwards of 25 cents a Kw-hr for electricity when it could be produced for one-tenth that. But if no one in the working class can be bothered to agitate on this issue, then perhaps, the peasants really don't need air conditioning. The sad thing about astronomical electricity costs is that it always hurts the people who are just barely scraping by, the most. The truth about nuclear energy is that an ideal reactor can be built that is nearly as simple as nature's perfect reactor, the Sun. And the fact that the Sun exists negates the attitude that anyone can discount, out of hand, the claim that a man-made reactor can be nearly as simple. The existence of the Sun means that anyone wh...
Read more

If They can Kill Your Parents.......

They will almost certainly kill you. But before I elaborate, I must state, indisputably, that at no point and in no way am I accusing the NY, NJ, and MN governors of premeditated mass murder. Rather, I am asserting that lacking any rational and credible explanation to the contrary, the most likely motive for any person's actions is the anticipated results; not to be confused with the actual results. Since no governor has offered an alternative explanation for putting Wuhanic plaque patients into a population of the most vulnerable nursing home residents, it remains true that the most likely motive for their actions were the actual results, which are also the most anticipated results; the untimely and unnecessary deaths of thousands of elderly people. If in fact these governors are capable of, and did in fact, act with such viciousness, then it is incumbent on the victim's survivors to act. Short of a convincing explanation, if the survivors of NY and NJ nursing homes do not fi...
Read more