Yins who reject the yangs

Although the topic of homosexuality is sacrosanct, the arguments that are never allowed to be spoken deserve to heard. The LGBT mafia asserts that failure to embrace homosexuality is equivalent to nazism. In rebuttal, allow me to say what it is actually all about.
Whatever created this reality created the human race with almost exactly 50/50 ratios of members with complimentary sex organs. In its infinite wisdom, it gave these opposing halves nearly diametrically different natures. So here we are, a being that has a codependent relationship with a group with which we have so many behavioral conflicts.
If we look at it honestly, neither half of the population has the 'right' perspective. The best guess is that both perspectives are important and valuable and that based on the simple existence of this reality, that perhaps we are somehow benefited by learning to accept, appreciate, and try to understand our counterpart personalities. Arguably, it might be surmised that since men and women possess complimentary sex organs, perhaps they also possess complimentary behavioral characteristics. And perhaps those that look askance at the LGBT individuals aren't so much homophobes and haters as LGBT members are heterophobes or genderists or yins who reject the yangs.
There is no doubt that it is easier to get along with a duplicate of yourself than to negotiate a relationship with a behavioral counterpart. And perhaps it is easier to reject the sex of the body you are born into if you have some identity conflict. But it is far from clear that taking that path is in an individuals best interest. If in fact, being gay or transgender is most accurately defined as a case of the yin rejecting the yang, then there is indisputable grounds for challenging this behavior. Of course, in the end, everyone should be free to do whatever they want as long as it doesn't transgress another's freedom. Likewise, those who see this as a case of immature behavior rejecting their naturally defined counterparts should be just as free to express those reservations. And it is certainly OK and essential that young people not be indoctrinated to believe that rejecting their naturally defined counterpart is indisputably OK.
As a corroborating observation, gays must more or less masturbate each other as a substitute for intercourse, where complimentary organs work together like an extension cord works with another extension cord. Also, gay couples can never have kids with each persons DNA or by natural means. Effectively, to be gay means that you have to go to extraordinary means for a substandard outcome. It is almost like crossing the street so you don't have to run into a member of the opposite sex. If there is any question as to who is the hater, it is the street crosser, not the person who does not automatically condone street crossing.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Catholic Church

  As all can see, all organizations become single-minded in time. In the past, nearly every straight person got married and had kids. In that the church had a celibacy clause, it offered an easy, sheltered life with status, wealth, and comfort. It was a natural haven for people disinclined to the opposite sex or inclined to children. They then actively selected like minded individuals, just as we see in journalism and academia. So it is almost a given that the church is a gay organization that does in fact recruit straight people for the trenches to insulate their leaders and camouflage the organization to prevent its exposure. Of course, this may just be speculation, but it is not specious. Just the other day I was talking to a lesbian coworker who declared, unabashedly, that her community actively denies straights inclusion into the inner circle or club as it were, because of their perception that there are enough straights who are intolerant of their lifestyle such that elimination
Read more

$27 trillion questions

 In that our country's financial underpinnings are a runaway train, it needs to be asked, "What exactly is meant by the term 'national debt' and why must interest, determined by the private Federal Reserve (FR), be paid on it?" And the most important question is "where do those interest payments go?" The FR was created in 1913 whereby the ordinary functions of the Treasury were given to private bankers. They invented the concept that they would be, not only the controllers, but the source of our nation's finances. The way it works is, if the government spends more than it takes in, the FR would 'loan' the govt money by printing it into existence and thereafter, the govt would be required to pay 'interest' on the 'loan' ad infinitum and that interest rate would be set by the FR. The explanation for this arrangement was that the FR was needed to regulate the availability of money to spur or retard the rate of growth to control i
Read more

Nearly as Simple as the Sun

An ideal reactor can be all but authenticated using computer simulation, probably within a day. Our engineering and computing capabilities are clearly sufficient. And all it would take to prove it is the decision to challenge the assertion. So why does this assertion matter to you? Because Germany pays upwards of 25 cents a Kw-hr for electricity when it could be produced for one-tenth that. But if no one in the working class can be bothered to agitate on this issue, then perhaps, the peasants really don't need air conditioning. The sad thing about astronomical electricity costs is that it always hurts the people who are just barely scraping by, the most. The truth about nuclear energy is that an ideal reactor can be built that is nearly as simple as nature's perfect reactor, the Sun. And the fact that the Sun exists negates the attitude that anyone can discount, out of hand, the claim that a man-made reactor can be nearly as simple. The existence of the Sun means that anyone wh
Read more