The Federal Reserve Flim Flam
For any who read this, I encourage all to raise their voice and demand an audit of the Federal Reserve or call the white house comment line at 202-456-1111 and demand an audit. Half of many people's mortgage payments goes to the Federal Reserve for no other reason but that they managed to convince people that interest has to be paid on printed money. Wouldn't it be great if everyone's mortgage payment was cut in half because people finally looked at what was really going on.
The supposed purpose of the Federal Reserve is to regulate the economy. Although China grew at 15% for years, to no detriment, we are told that if a Republican president has an economy above 4%, the Fed is needed to increase interest rates and thereby throttle back the economy, to prevent inflation. This in itself would be innocent enough except that this Fed mandated interest rate is assigned to Fed provided 'loans' requiring a half a trillion dollar a year in interest payment from the government to the Fed.
Of course, if in fact the Fed was needed and a decreasing of financial liquidity was an important function, it seems obvious that decreased liquidity could be just as easily accomplished by simply not providing additional funds. Then what money was available for loans would compete on the basis of lending basics, like minimum risk or strategic need, etc. The fact that the method chosen to 'regulate' the economy results in gargantuan interest payments to an unaudited 'private' entity seems embarrassingly obvious.
One of two possible realities must be true. Either the hundreds of billions in national debt interest payments are simply an accounting ledger notation, or they exist in paper bonds that are authentic legal tender. We have been told that the way it works is that when the federal government 'borrows' money from the fed due to deficit spending, the Fed prints bonds equal to the number added to the national checking account. They then collect interest on those 'bonds' according to an arbitrary variable interest rate defined by them.What a racket? They have a copyright on our nations currency.
So it begs the question, "Does the Fed embezzle $500B/yr or not?" To answer, one must first ask the question "Who among us is above taking $500B/yr if they can get away with it?" I am pretty sure even Jesus, if he were who he claimed, would have difficulty with that temptation. Anyone else, forget it.
The overwhelmingly most likely hypothesis is that this 'private' entity does in fact use those interest payment bonds to own the world. Not only have they bought controlling interest in all the hallmark, legacy corporations like GE and ATT, but they have provided the funds to crown the current blue chips like Amazon and Facebook. Back when Amazon was getting started, there were no less than a dozen companies vying to be the online Wal-Mart. However, the winner was the one that got the funding. We are supposed to be impressed with Jeff Bezos or Mark Zuckerburg because they are supposed to represent the next Sam Walton. However, Bezos and Zuckerberg are just the puppets in front of the financiers curtain.
For a while now it has struck me as peculiar how all the new titans of industry are universally united around a globalist mantra that advocates for all things bad to the average American. I note that the entire system including academia, Hollywood, the deep state, and the media are virulently opposed to free or even honest press, small government, and low taxes, in a country that is majority conservative. It is almost exactly a blue blood against the peasants dynamic. It seems almost impossible until you throw in the Federal Reserve.
The most likely way that this has come about is that a single interest group has had access to the huge levels of resources required to take over everything in society. It is as if one guy rolled the dice ten times for every single roll of the dice of the other monopoly players. The Fed, by being able to siphon off 3% of the Federal governments debt every year, without ever being audited, has been able to buy up everything in society and now run everything by virtue of owning everything, including the controlling interest of the government. This helps explain why it is always the same people on all the different corporate boards.
Another point that needs to be highlighted is the concept of deficit spending. Barring a war, every year, our nation's net wealth increases, like a growing coral reef. If today there is $1000 chasing a 10 homes, each home is worth $100. If 10 homes are added, but no money is added to the money supply, each home would then be worth $50. Money must be added to the total money supply equal to the net aggregation of wealth. Instead of just acknowledging this and declaring deficit spending a normal function of government, the bankers have instead created a private bank called the Fed, whereby they call increasing the money supply 'incurring a national debt' which must then have interest paid to their private bank to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars. Why? Because, well, they say we have to pay for borrowing the money printed by these banksters. It's not that we are paying savers for the use of their money, we are paying fantastic sums to an unaudited private entity because they say the availability of easy credit needs to be inhibited and this how it should be done.
In the end, the truth is there if anyone will look. Why is the Fed private? Where do those interest payments go? and most importantly, if $500B/yr can be stolen, only an idiot presumes it wouldn't be. All readers need to start clamoring for an audit of the Fed.
The supposed purpose of the Federal Reserve is to regulate the economy. Although China grew at 15% for years, to no detriment, we are told that if a Republican president has an economy above 4%, the Fed is needed to increase interest rates and thereby throttle back the economy, to prevent inflation. This in itself would be innocent enough except that this Fed mandated interest rate is assigned to Fed provided 'loans' requiring a half a trillion dollar a year in interest payment from the government to the Fed.
Of course, if in fact the Fed was needed and a decreasing of financial liquidity was an important function, it seems obvious that decreased liquidity could be just as easily accomplished by simply not providing additional funds. Then what money was available for loans would compete on the basis of lending basics, like minimum risk or strategic need, etc. The fact that the method chosen to 'regulate' the economy results in gargantuan interest payments to an unaudited 'private' entity seems embarrassingly obvious.
One of two possible realities must be true. Either the hundreds of billions in national debt interest payments are simply an accounting ledger notation, or they exist in paper bonds that are authentic legal tender. We have been told that the way it works is that when the federal government 'borrows' money from the fed due to deficit spending, the Fed prints bonds equal to the number added to the national checking account. They then collect interest on those 'bonds' according to an arbitrary variable interest rate defined by them.What a racket? They have a copyright on our nations currency.
So it begs the question, "Does the Fed embezzle $500B/yr or not?" To answer, one must first ask the question "Who among us is above taking $500B/yr if they can get away with it?" I am pretty sure even Jesus, if he were who he claimed, would have difficulty with that temptation. Anyone else, forget it.
The overwhelmingly most likely hypothesis is that this 'private' entity does in fact use those interest payment bonds to own the world. Not only have they bought controlling interest in all the hallmark, legacy corporations like GE and ATT, but they have provided the funds to crown the current blue chips like Amazon and Facebook. Back when Amazon was getting started, there were no less than a dozen companies vying to be the online Wal-Mart. However, the winner was the one that got the funding. We are supposed to be impressed with Jeff Bezos or Mark Zuckerburg because they are supposed to represent the next Sam Walton. However, Bezos and Zuckerberg are just the puppets in front of the financiers curtain.
For a while now it has struck me as peculiar how all the new titans of industry are universally united around a globalist mantra that advocates for all things bad to the average American. I note that the entire system including academia, Hollywood, the deep state, and the media are virulently opposed to free or even honest press, small government, and low taxes, in a country that is majority conservative. It is almost exactly a blue blood against the peasants dynamic. It seems almost impossible until you throw in the Federal Reserve.
The most likely way that this has come about is that a single interest group has had access to the huge levels of resources required to take over everything in society. It is as if one guy rolled the dice ten times for every single roll of the dice of the other monopoly players. The Fed, by being able to siphon off 3% of the Federal governments debt every year, without ever being audited, has been able to buy up everything in society and now run everything by virtue of owning everything, including the controlling interest of the government. This helps explain why it is always the same people on all the different corporate boards.
Another point that needs to be highlighted is the concept of deficit spending. Barring a war, every year, our nation's net wealth increases, like a growing coral reef. If today there is $1000 chasing a 10 homes, each home is worth $100. If 10 homes are added, but no money is added to the money supply, each home would then be worth $50. Money must be added to the total money supply equal to the net aggregation of wealth. Instead of just acknowledging this and declaring deficit spending a normal function of government, the bankers have instead created a private bank called the Fed, whereby they call increasing the money supply 'incurring a national debt' which must then have interest paid to their private bank to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars. Why? Because, well, they say we have to pay for borrowing the money printed by these banksters. It's not that we are paying savers for the use of their money, we are paying fantastic sums to an unaudited private entity because they say the availability of easy credit needs to be inhibited and this how it should be done.
In the end, the truth is there if anyone will look. Why is the Fed private? Where do those interest payments go? and most importantly, if $500B/yr can be stolen, only an idiot presumes it wouldn't be. All readers need to start clamoring for an audit of the Fed.
Comments
Post a Comment